Practical answers for medical-device manufacturers entering the EU.
Source-led guidance on EC REP, MDR, IVDR, evidence, importers, EUDAMED and post-market responsibility.
Practical regulatory articles
Questions raised by manufacturers before an EU market-entry project begins. Every article identifies its author, publication date, reading time, official sources and a defined next step.
The certificate that works in both directions, and the obligation that does not
The TGA accepts certificates from EU notified bodies as comparable overseas evidence. What that changes for an Australian manufacturer, and what Article 11 still requires.
Read the article → Sequencing · seven marketsWhat a European certificate is worth outside the Union
Great Britain, Switzerland, Australia, Singapore, Israel, Türkiye and Ukraine all treat European conformity assessment as evidence, on different terms.
Read the article → MDSAP · Annex IX MDROne audit, five regulators, and still no route into the European Union
What the single audit programme is accepted for, why a European certificate cannot come from it, and how much of the gap the 2026 revision closed.
Read the article → Israel · recognition routeFor an Israeli manufacturer, Europe is usually the first market, not the third
Israeli registration leans on approval in a recognised country, and a certificate that was never used to place a device on the EU market does not carry it.
Read the article → Ukraine · Resolutions 759 and 758Ukraine is rebuilding its rules on the MDR. The EU route just became cheaper to add
What the June 2026 technical regulations change for a Ukrainian manufacturer, why recognition runs one way, and where the twelve-month transitional period actually applies.
Read the article → Türkiye · ÜTS and EUDAMEDYour ÜTS records answer most of the questions EUDAMED asks
Where the Turkish product tracking data maps onto a European device registration, which level is usually missing, and what carries no legal effect in the Union.
Read the article → Switzerland · Article 11A Swiss technical file is an MDR file. What is missing is an address in the Union
Why Swiss manufacturers arrive with the smallest evidence gap and the sharpest legal obstacle, and what a single shipment into the EU already triggers.
Read the article → Great Britain · SI 2024/1368The 2025 UK surveillance rules built part of your MDR file already
The fifteen-day clock, the periodic safety update report and trend reporting map onto Articles 83 to 88 MDR. What still has to be built, and why the MHRA consultation changes the arithmetic.
Read the article → Supply · Article 10a MDRDiscontinuing a product line in Europe now takes six months of notice
The notification duty added by the 2024 amendment, who receives it when the manufacturer sits outside the Union, and where quality systems usually fail to connect it.
Read the article → Cybersecurity · Regulation (EU) 2024/2847CRA reporting starts on 11 September 2026, and the device exemption is narrower than it reads
Article 2(2) excludes products covered by the MDR. It does not exclude the portal, the companion software without a medical purpose or the tools shipped around the device.
Read the article → Clinical evidence · Article 61 MDRFrom 510(k) to MDR: which parts of the submission survive the move
A predicate is not an equivalent device. What can be carried across from a US submission, and what has to exist before a notified body will progress the file.
Read the article → Sterile devices · Article 52(7) MDRSterile devices: the European evidence a US sterilization file often lacks
Sterility assurance for the STERILE claim, ethylene oxide residues, packaging validation and shelf life, and why a sterile class I device still needs a notified body.
Read the article → Quality systems · QMSR and MDRQMSR compliance and MDR conformity: what still separates them
The FDA now incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference. The processes the Regulation adds on top, from the person responsible for regulatory compliance to the periodic safety update report.
Read the article → EUDAMED · Article 123(3) MDREUDAMED registration: what changed in May 2026 and what falls due in November
Which modules became mandatory, what the twelve-month obligation actually covers, and why a manufacturer outside the Union cannot obtain a single registration number alone.
Read the article → Green claims · Directive (EU) 2024/825Green Claims on Medical Devices: What Manufacturers Must Change by 27 September 2026
A practical review route for consumer-facing device claims, packaging statements, sustainability labels and climate-offset messaging.
Read the article → EC REP · Article 11Do I need an EU Authorized Representative?
A decision guide for manufacturers established outside the EU, including mandate timing and required documentation.
Read the article → Evidence mappingCan FDA, Health Canada or Swissmedic records be reused in the EU?
What non-EU regulatory evidence can support EU compliance, and where MDR or IVDR-specific evidence remains necessary.
Read the article → Market entryWhat must be ready before the first EU importer is appointed?
The minimum technical, registration and supply-chain documentation needed before placing a device on the EU market.
Read the article → ClassificationWhy device classification should be checked before you request a quote
How classification changes conformity assessment, evidence requirements, timelines and representation review.
Read the article → Post-marketWhat does ongoing representation actually involve?
A practical overview of mandate maintenance, authority communication, vigilance and post-market responsibilities.
Read the article → Risk reviewWhen should an EU representative decline a mandate?
Warning signs that prevent a responsible representative from accepting or continuing a mandate.
Read the article →